<%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%> TUG-K Project
NC State University
Quick Link    
North Carolina State University Department of Physics   |  North Carolina State University
 

 

Kinematics Graph Interpretation Project

 

ROBERT J. BEICHNER
Department of Physics
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202, USA
Kimberly D. C. Benjamin
St. Mary's  School
Raleigh, NC
--

This research was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation (MDR-9154127). Opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Foundation. Additional support came from RasterOps Corporation, SONY of America, and Apple Computer.

Fadeline.gif (1602 bytes)

The primary goal of the Kinematics Graphing Project is to investigate the ability of students to interpret kinematics graphs and to generate a set of suggestions for faculty teaching the subject.

Recent work has uncovered a consistent set of student difficulties with graphs of position, velocity, and acceleration versus time. These include misinterpreting graphs as pictures, slope/height confusion, problems finding the slopes of lines not passing through the origin, and the inability to interpret the meaning of the area under various graph curves. For this particular study, data from 895 students at the high school and college level was collected and analyzed. The test used to collect the data is included at the end of the article and should prove useful for other researchers studying kinematics learning as well as instructors teaching the material. The process of developing and analyzing the test is fully documented and is suggested as a model for similar assessment projects.

Our research group has been involved in the rigorous development and evaluation of instruments for uncovering student misconceptions in kinematics graph interpretation (TUG-K), direct current circuits (DIRECT), and ray optics. As part of our development methodology, we interview students who have taken open-ended and multiple choice versions of our instruments. During the writing process we make assumptions about what students are thinking as they answer items. Interviewing gives us insight into the validity of those assumptions and often suggests entirely new approaches. In our work on the TUG-K, students exhibited thinking that was consistent with the findings of previous research but also revealed problem areas not seen before.

The following presentation organizes previous and new findings under headings designed to help teachers work on improving their students ability to work with kinematics graphs.Fadeline.gif (1602 bytes)

Provide a greater number of examples with varying levels of complexity.

  • Students believe the value of the dependent variable at t = 0 is always part of the calculations.

Rather than finding the slope just around the point of interest, a student calculates Dy/Dx using the initial value, even though there is not a line between the two points used in the calculation.

  • Students can use incorrect methods to get correct answers for certain problems.

Multiplying axis values can give the same answer as calculating area under the curve if the area happens to be a rectangle.

  • Students tend to generalize hints to inappropriate situations.

A student remembers his teacher showing him how to calculate the area under the curve when the graph forms a triangle. He encounters another graph that forms a triangle shape and calculates its area, even though this problem actually requires him to find the slope.

Compare graphs of position, velocity, and acceleration versus time for a given situation.

  • Students believe kinematics variables behave identically or very similarly and should therefore be graphed identically or very similarly.

A student reasons that if the acceleration is decreasing then the velocity must be decreasing.

  • Students see graphs as representing the physical path of motion.

Given the situation of a ball rolling down a hill, a student would draw a graph that looks like a hill.

  • Students do not look for consistency of slopes and heights between graphs.

A student does not make the segment of greatest slope in a position-time graph match the segment of greatest height in a velocity-time graph.

Provide examples that require students to make qualitative comparisons between graphs.

  • Students are unable to qualitatively discriminate between slopes.

A student cannot tell which of two slopes is steeper.

  • Students do not recognize situations that require them to calculate area if there is no grid present.

A student who was taught to calculate area under the curve by counting the squares does not know how to approach a graph because there were no "little bars."

Require students to verbalize their thoughts about problems.

  • Students use kinematics terms interchangeably and inappropriately.

In a situation where the position is changing uniformly, a student uses the term "acceleration" when she should say "velocity."

  • Students misunderstand basic definitions.

A student believes a velocity-time graph should look like the corresponding position-time graph because "position over time is velocity."

Emphasize graphing calculations that are unique and different from equation-oriented problems.

  • Students use simple formulae or unit analysis when they should be calculating slope or area under the curve.

Knowing the units of velocity are m/s, a student divides the position value by the time value instead of finding the slope.

  • Students read off the ordinate value when they should be finding slope.

On a position-time graph, a student gives the value of the position as the value of the velocity at that point in time.

  • Students do not understand the meaning of area under the curve.

A student does not realize that change in velocity is found by calculating the area under the curve of an acceleration-time graph.

Fadeline.gif (1602 bytes)

Load an article describing the project, in Acrobat pdf format.

The test itself is available by mail or electronically. Please contact Bob Beichner.

 
People   |   Projects   |   Facilities   |   Papers and Talks   |   Links   |   Contact Us   |   Home   |   NC State Physics Department
Copyright © 2007 NCSU Physics Education R & D Group. All Rights Reserved. Site designed by Academic Web Pages.