|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
| Department/Program: 05SC - Student Conduct |
|
Outcome: |
Collaborative Training | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
As a function of the OSC's participation in a collaborative training, Deans, Department Heads, and Directors will demonstrate knowledge of the processes for handling student crises. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Interviews |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
| Student Affairs Evelyn Reimans team |
|
Outcome: |
Insight | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Students that violate the Code will demonstrate insight into how their behavior effects all aspects of their life. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Student portfolios |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
| Student Affairs Evelyn Reimans team |
| Institution Objective Type: SACS_CR_5 |
| Department/Program: 05SC - Student Conduct |
|
Outcome: |
Collaborative Training | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
As a function of the OSC's participation in a collaborative training, Deans, Department Heads, and Directors will demonstrate knowledge of the processes for handling student crises. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Interviews |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
| The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic review of programs and services that (a) results in continuing improvement and (b) demonstrates that the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission. |
| Institution Objective Type: SACS_CS_16 |
| Department/Program: 05SC - Student Conduct |
|
Outcome: |
Assessment Plan | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will create an on-going assessment process and evaluate the effectiveness of the evaluation methods through the review of final reports | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Each year a process for
assessment of specific outcomes will be implemented and observations
regarding the process will be included in the final report. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This will occur every year. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
| The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and its administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results. |
| Institution Objective Type: Student Affairs |
| Department/Program: 05SC - Student Conduct |
|
Outcome: |
Assessment Plan | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will create an on-going assessment process and evaluate the effectiveness of the evaluation methods through the review of final reports | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Each year a process for
assessment of specific outcomes will be implemented and observations
regarding the process will be included in the final report. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This will occur every year. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
| Student Affairs |
| Institution Objective Type: Not Associated with any Institution Goal Type |
| Department/Program: 05SC - Student Conduct |
|
Outcome: |
CAS Standards | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will meet the professional standards as determined by the CAS Judicial Program and Services Standards. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
External review: Use
the standards from the CAS process and the program outcomes and ask
people outside the department to review and rate each standard based
on the materials provided by our office. Eight faculty, staff, and
students will participate. They will be divided into teams of two
and will be assigned sections of CAS and the program outcomes to review
and rate based on materials provided by OSC. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This stage will occur every three years. The prep work will occur in the fall, the evaluations in the early spring and the reports from the reviewers will be provided to OSC in late spring. OSC staff will review and prioritize as appropriate. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Change behaviors | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Students that violate The Code will demonstrate a change in behaviors. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Statistics |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Decision-making skills | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Students that violate the Code will demonstrate improved decision-making skills. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Student Portfolios |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken of the previous spring and summer during the fall 2003 and measurements of fall 2003 will be taken in the spring 2004. A final report will be complied during the April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Educate-program outcome | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will educate the community on the Code of Student Conduct by presenting educational programs on all aspects of the Code, posting information in the classrooms on academic integrity and distributing brochures on programs and services, suspension, and hearings in the office. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
External review: Use
the standards from the CAS process and the program outcomes and ask
people outside the department to review and rate each standard based
on the materials provided by our office. Eight faculty, staff, and
students will participate. They will be divided into teams of two
and will be assigned sections of CAS and the program outcomes to review
and rate based on materials provided by OSC. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This stage will occur every three years. The prep work will occur in the fall, the evaluations in the early spring and the reports from the reviewers will be provided to OSC in late spring. OSC staff will review and prioritize as appropriate. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Educational Programs-learning | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
As a function of educational programs, students will demonstrate knowledge of the Code of Student Conduct. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Surveys |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Enforcement | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Instructors will demonstrate knowledge of the procedures for resolving cases of academic dishonesty . | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Judicial Statistics |
|||
|
Schedule: |
After the initial Stage 3, changes will be made on an ongoing basis. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Information will be used to improve presentations for maximum benefit to faculty. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Quantitative and qualitative methods of data analysis will be used to measure outcomes. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Impartial treatment | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
As a function of judicial board training, student board member will demonstrate impartial treatment of student and staff that come before the board regardless of race, color, religion, creed , sex national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation or veteran status, consistent with NC State's administrative regulations. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Judicial statistics |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Implement New Ideas | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will gather and implement new ideas about educational interventions, both proactive and reactive, as a function of attendence at national conferences. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
External review: Use
the standards from the CAS process and the program outcomes and ask
people outside the department to review and rate each standard based
on the materials provided by our office. Eight faculty, staff, and
students will participate. They will be divided into teams of two
and will be assigned sections of CAS and the program outcomes to review
and rate based on materials provided by OSC. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This stage will occur every three years. The prep work will occur in the fall, the evaluations in the early spring and the reports from the reviewers will be provided to OSC in late spring. OSC staff will review and prioritize as appropriate. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Increase credibility | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will develop partnerships with other offices to increase our credibility with faculty, increase student, faculty and staff contact, and promote professional development of OSC staff. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
External review: Use
the standards from the CAS process and the program outcomes and ask
people outside the department to review and rate each standard based
on the materials provided by our office. Eight faculty, staff, and
students will participate. They will be divided into teams of two
and will be assigned sections of CAS and the program outcomes to review
and rate based on materials provided by OSC. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This stage will occur every three years. The prep work will occur in the fall, the evaluations in the early spring and the reports from the reviewers will be provided to OSC in late spring. OSC staff will review and prioritize as appropriate. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Inform parents | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will inform parents of certain behavior problems, request their involvement, and reinforce behavior change. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
External review: Use
the standards from the CAS process and the program outcomes and ask
people outside the department to review and rate each standard based
on the materials provided by our office. Eight faculty, staff, and
students will participate. They will be divided into teams of two
and will be assigned sections of CAS and the program outcomes to review
and rate based on materials provided by OSC. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This stage will occur every three years. The prep work will occur in the fall, the evaluations in the early spring and the reports from the reviewers will be provided to OSC in late spring. OSC staff will review and prioritize as appropriate. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Involvement with judicial system | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
As a function of their involvement with the judicial system, Student Board Members, Assistants, and the Student Chief Justice will demonstrate increased critical thinking skills. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Pre-Post Test |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Leadership | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
As a function of their involvement with the judicial system, Student Judicial Assistants and the Student Chief Justice will demonstrate increased leadership skills | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Student Portfolios |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Meet needs | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will meet the needs of various University constituents. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Develop and implement
surveys to determine if OSC is meeting the needs of various constituents.
Greek Life, University Housing, Counseling Center, Students, Board
members, faculty that have turned in violations, Campus Police |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This will occur in the
second year of the plan. Surveys will be developed in early fall and
sent out in October. Data will be entered and analyzed in early spring
and reports will be generated by March. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results of the surveys will be used to ensure that we are meeting our constituents needs. We will use the recommendations from the final report to make changes in our practice, when necessary, to meet those (appropriate) needs that are not being met. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Based on the feedback provided in the surveys and the information in the final report, the surveys may be altered for he next time this stage of the plan is conducted. In addition we may add interviews or other methods of measurement. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Offer Information | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will offer information about services, the Code, and procedures through our web page. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
External review: Use
the standards from the CAS process and the program outcomes and ask
people outside the department to review and rate each standard based
on the materials provided by our office. Eight faculty, staff, and
students will participate. They will be divided into teams of two
and will be assigned sections of CAS and the program outcomes to review
and rate based on materials provided by OSC. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This stage will occur every three years. The prep work will occur in the fall, the evaluations in the early spring and the reports from the reviewers will be provided to OSC in late spring. OSC staff will review and prioritize as appropriate. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Staff and Equipment | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
Staff in the Office of Student Conduct will ensure that the necessary staff and equipment are provided to meet goals and outcomes. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
External review: Use
the standards from the CAS process and the program outcomes and ask
people outside the department to review and rate each standard based
on the materials provided by our office. Eight faculty, staff, and
students will participate. They will be divided into teams of two
and will be assigned sections of CAS and the program outcomes to review
and rate based on materials provided by OSC. |
|||
|
Schedule: |
This stage will occur every three years. The prep work will occur in the fall, the evaluations in the early spring and the reports from the reviewers will be provided to OSC in late spring. OSC staff will review and prioritize as appropriate. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
The results will be used to ensure that OSC is meeting national standards and the OSC program outcomes. Recommendations for change should imply that a change will result in meetings these standards. OSC staff will prioritize the recommendations and set timelines for change. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
During the recommendations review, decisions will be made as to how to alter the assessment process for the next time these outcomes are reviewed. Needed changes to the materials or processes will be documented in the final report and timelines will be set. |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
Outcome: |
Training | |||
|
Outcome Description: |
As a function of the OSC's training, the appropriate University staff will demonstrate knowledge of the Code of Student Conduct. | |||
|
Track: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Assessment Method: |
Judicial Statistics |
|||
|
Schedule: |
Year three of plan. Measurements will be taken in the fall 2003 for students that were seen in the spring 2003 and summer 2003. Measurements will be taken in the spring 2004 for the students seen in the fall 2003. A final report will be complied during April and May and reviewed in June. |
|||
|
Feedback Loop: |
Results will be used to make adjustments to sanctions and record keeping as needed to improve student learning. |
|||
|
Assessment Evaluation: |
Tools and methods will be reviewed as the final reports are reviewed. This includes: Interview outlines, Note taking procedures, Rubrics, staff training on assessment |
|
Related Institutional Objectives: |
|
|
|
| Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive | |