|
Technology
in an Inclusive Setting
|
||
| "By
the completion of the project, most students were able to report their
involvement in Internet research, design and presentation of a slide show,
as well as use of more sophisticated tools, such as painting and drawing
in ClarisWorks."
|
FINDINGS:
Data Results
Student Basic Skills Pre/Post Survey (Appendix #4): In the eight areas surveyed, all peer mentors reported an increase of at least 90% from the pre-survey. These results were calculated based upon the comparison of students' responses to the same questions given both in the pre-survey and the post-survey. No questions were changed. We looked specifically at the responses to question #8, "In what other technology related activities have you participated?" When we compared the pre and post-surveys, we found that there had been an increase in the number of activities. When averaged and compared, the results represented an increase of 90%. For example, most of the peer mentors reported on their pre-surveys that they had been involved in word processing activities only. By the completion of the project, most students were able to report their involvement in Internet research, design and presentation of a slide show, as well as use of more sophisticated tools, such as painting and drawing in ClarisWorks. Video Observations (Appendix #5): On five different occasions for a period of ten minutes at each taping session, portions of the technology mentor program were recorded: These sessions occurred on the first day of the mentor program, one month into the mentor program, two months into the mentor program, three months into the mentor program, four months into the mentor program, and on the final day of the mentor program. Prior to video taping, we established a checklist of behaviors that we hoped students would demonstrate. Our checklist included the following behaviors:
Of the five behaviors observed, improvements occurred with each evaluation. Initially students were exhibiting assessed behaviors with approximately 40% accuracy. Over a three month period of mentoring sessions, these results increased to between 90 and 100% in all areas. The special education students also showed an increase in their basic skills. We found that 80% of the students were able to perform all basic skills which were not present at the time of the pre-survey. Technology and Inclusion Staff Survey (Appendix #6): Several themes were present in the pre/post surveys. Observations made by several staff members included the following:
|
|
Meridian: A Middle
School Computer Technologies Journal
a service of
NC State University, Raleigh, NC
Volume 3, Issue
1, Winter 2000
ISSN 1097-9778
URL: http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/2000wint/inclusive/findings.html
contact
Meridian
All rights reserved
by the author.
| Table of Contents | Review Board | Resources | Archive |