meridian
home current issue editorial board reader survey submissions archive


Gender Differences
in Computer Technology Achievement

Kimberly V. Hale

Page 2

1 | 2 | 3 | 4


Experiment 1

Method

Participants. The participants were an intact group of 8th grade students in an Explorations of Technology class from a central Georgia middle school winter semester. The ethnicity information for the 1,072 students attending this central Georgia middle school was as follows: 61% were African-American, 2% were Asian, 36% were Caucasian and 1% were Hispanic. There were 549 students (51%) that received free or reduced lunch. A total of 64 children (32 boys and 32 girls), aged 13 and 14 years old, participated in this study. Students were matched based on reading scores from the Georgia Criterion-Referenced Competency Test and placed into same sex pairs.

Measurement Instrument. A pretest was given to investigate possible differences between males and females in terms of computer technology achievement. The pretest consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions published by Learning Labs, Inc. Students were given the same 10-question multiple-choice pretest as a posttest measure.

Learning Labs, Inc. (P.O. Box 1419 Calhoun, GA, 30703) is an educational resource business with hundreds of technology products on the market. Their products have been adopted and implemented in well over a thousand schools nationwide. Learning Labs, Inc. produces exceptional technology-based educational packages for both middle and high school levels.

Procedures. The researcher has taught Explorations in Technology to 8th graders at Weaver Middle School since January 1997. According to the curriculum guide for technology education developed by the Georgia Department of Education in 1988, the purpose of the middle school industrial arts/technology program is to provide students an orientation and exploration into the technologies of communication, manufacturing and construction, and energy and power control. A further purpose is to augment the students' base of concrete experiences providing better foundation for the development and understanding of more abstract academic concepts.

In the Exploration in Technology class, students worked independently through 3 technology units per semester. Pairs of students completed 9 self-directed activities from a lab manual developed by Learning Labs, Inc. without teacher instruction. All the units began with a brief history of the subject followed by 8 days of step by step instruction and was concluded with a problem solving activity. Each area included a pretest and posttest. Students completed a set of study questions and vocabulary words while progressing through the unit. In addition, all units included multiple worksheets, experiments, demonstrations, and problem solving activities.

At the beginning of winter semester, same sex students were randomly paired in 4 Explorations of Technology classes. Students were given a pretest on animation and assigned to work in the animation lab area (module). Over a period of 9 school days, students spent 40 minutes a day working on the student directed activities found in the animation lab manual compiled by Learning Labs, Inc.

In the animation module students learned about the history of animation and gained a working knowledge of how to operate a computer animation system. Students generated numerous animation sequences by utilizing an existing library of computerized actors as well as actors they created from scratch. Students also used these animated sequences to produce a videotape with animation and sound.

Students worked in pairs to complete the activities and were instructed to solve problems within their group. All classes had the same assignments. Academic objectives were the same for each class. All tests measuring achievement were identical.

Study Design and Data Analysis. This was a casual-comparative research study. This design involved selecting 2 groups differing on an independent variable (gender) and comparing the groups on a dependent variable (achievement). The scores from the pretest and posttest of male and female students were compared using Analysis of Covariance with repeated measures and gender as the factor. The repeated measure was the pretest and posttest. The probability level was set at alpha = .05 for a two-tailed test.

Page 2

previous

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

next



Current Issue | Editorial Board | Reader Survey | Special Honors
Submissions |
Resources | Archive | Text Version | Email
NC State Homepage


Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal
a service of NC State University, Raleigh, NC
Volume 8, Issue 1, Winter 2005
ISSN 1097 9778
URL: http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/sum2002/gender/2.html
Contact Meridian
All rights reserved by the authors.



Meridian is a member of the GEM Consortium