meridian
home current issue editorial board reader survey submissions archive


Image Processing for Teaching (IPT) in Science Classrooms

Kadriye O Lewis

Page 4

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6


After Ms. Rose started using IPT, she noticed that some students who were usually behavior problems became engrossed in the use of the IPT program. In my fourth observation, the students were working on the degree of angle measurement by using the angle-measuring tool for the activity "Polygon Patterns". The students were so wrapped up in their work of measuring real life objects like the roof of a house that they did not hear the dismissal bell when the class period was over. Ms. Rose found the IPT software highly motivating.

"One of the things I like about the program so far is that I can take the child who normally has no interest, no motivation at all and they start using the program. They become extremely motivated" (TI: CPS: Ms. Rose, p.8).

Eight students I interviewed expressed their desire to use IPT more than once a week. They also wanted to use IPT in other subject areas such as Social studies, Language Arts and Math.

The students were aware of the importance of visual learning and the use of technology in their classroom and commented that reading from books and class notes was boring. They observed that it is much easier to store written information in computers. Andy said:

"…. Sometimes I lose my notes, but the computer cannot lose that unless somebody takes it out or somebody erases it on the computer" (SI-5: CPS: Andy, p. 4).

Most of the students emphasized that learning with IPT had been more fun and effective than learning from books and class notes. Almost all the students reported that their grades had improved as a result of using IPT. Ms. Rose also indicated that low achievers had made significant improvements in their grades. The students also mentioned that they did not easily forget the things they had learned using IPT. On the other hand, one of the biggest advantages of IPT is that it allows students to study in the class or the lab without worrying about adverse outside environmental conditions. As stated earlier, Ms. Rose noted that due to the weather conditions in the middle of winter they could not go out to do a living sundial program, but they were able to do it in the lab without going outside.

Effects on teacher-student interactions

Since Ms Rose had been using some other software in her teaching she could not say much about the interpersonal communications in her classroom. She did not feel that the students' interactions had changed. She described her students as technology friendly, they are used to working with technology and they are used to working with a partner or working in a small group. According to her, the students were comfortable with using technology alone, with other things, such as a textbook or whatever else might be necessary to reach for solutions. In her case, IPT was another tool she could use to effectively convey information and knowledge to her students.

Except for two students I interviewed, all of them preferred working with a partner or in a group. They believed that they could complete tasks faster and more effectively within a group, especially when they had difficulty in understanding any part of the instruction. The other two students described themselves as the kind of person that preferred to work alone. They found that when they worked in a group or in pairs they were more easily confused. Nevertheless, the teacher was always available for assistance. The students' attitudes were highly positive towards IPT and they liked everything about it. The IPT software encouraged the students when they were having difficulty with the steps to ask questions.

Major strengths and weaknesses of IPT

Strengths


Ms. Rose had used images in her teaching before, but she had never used a program that allowed her to manipulate the images. She had never been able to have the students go in and take measurements of real life things, rotate them, or manipulate the images. This was a completely new approach in her teaching. Her enthusiasm was obvious when she gave an example of one of the Physics activities. She said, "this has excellent animation sound waves and it is perfect to use without any additional preparation."

One of the biggest advantages of IPT is that it is highly motivational, as mentioned above in Ms. Rose's excerpts from the interview. It uses real life images, which are in real life settings not imaginary or made up settings and also helps students to understand abstract ideas visually. Ms.Rose showed the Math activity "Polygon Patterns" to one of the Math teachers before she took the students in there. The Math teacher's comment was:

"I like the way they used real life images instead of color geometric shapes which are what they would normally do" (TI: CPS: Ms. Rose, p.13).

Ms. Rose and Jenny mentioned that the most effective parts of IPT was the measuring tool that allowed students to measure any kind of real life objects, no matter what the shapes were.

"… If we could never have been able to measure, if we were looking for angles and things like other geometric shapes like taking real life groups of houses and patterns of kitchen tiles. That would be difficult for us to do the measurement even if we had gotten to where we could have seen them by taking a trip to down town or something…This program allows us to do that and I think, that's wonderful" (TI: CPS: Ms. Rose, p.14).

Through my observations, I realized that science education is an activity-based process that provides an exciting method of teaching and learning. However, experiments and demonstrations may involve inherent risks for both the teacher and the student. On the other hand, field trips require special vigilance with respect to traffic and road safety, safe practices in study areas when obtaining samples, and an awareness of changes in weather. IPT is a safe way to learn in this aspect to create a positive environment with the use of real life objects.

Class A's students liked drawing their contour map using the IPT software. Ms. Rose explained that the students could draw their contour map with paper and pencil. But the biggest difference was; they were drawing it on the computer with the IPT program that allowed it to be projected so they could actually get the 3D images of the contour map they drew. Again, Ms Rose clearly stated that this hands-on approach to the instruction of science developed positive attitudes in science teaching that encouraged low achievers. It was easy to illustrate things with building stacks, and then animate the images. Ms. Rose noted:

"The State of Ohio list 'how man's (outlook) changed over time'…we look at our solar system how different astronomers looked at it. You know our solar system changed and how going all the way back to Aristotle and Ptolemy and bringing it up a little bit. One of the people they have trouble with is [Replor] he has these epi circles. It is very difficult for the students to visualize it abstractly, so I tried to use the program to draw and animate an illustration of epi circles. …. But it certainly seemed to help them understand much better about the pattern and how it follows" (TI: CPS: Ms. Rose, p.4).

Ms. Rose emphasized that IPT was compatible with the competency based education objectives of the State of Ohio. It helped the students make inferences and draw conclusions from the activities they studied. Furthermore, Ms. Rose and the students described the IPT software as an interactive, and investigative approach of learning science, especially this program encouraged the students to pursue asking questions of why, when, how, and "what if?" scenarios in biology, physics, and chemistry.

IPT has a good quality of science content in which activities were designed for both individual students, small groups or the whole class. Neither Ms. Rose nor the students I interviewed detected any major errors in the materials. Ms. Rose found the IPT program was approachable for the less experienced computer users and the appropriateness for the activities depended on the students' level.

Weaknesses

As I mentioned earlier, the most uncomfortable aspects for the teacher and the students was the user interface of the IPT, which was not friendly at all. The directions were not student-oriented and so many steps in the activities made the process very confusing. Ms. Rose described the activities in IPT as a great tool to teach, but sometimes they were too complicated for her seventh graders.

"…. Some of the activities are way too complicated for my middle school kids, but it is like the 'Roller Coaster' activity, I tried very seriously to figure out how to break it down, ended up doing it in the whole group. That was a perfectly fine way to teach to the whole group, but not put them into individual computers, it is just too complicated, the steps were too much for them" (TI: CPS: Ms. Rose, p.11).

Moreover, she emphasized that IPT had neither rubrics/guidelines for assessment for the teacher or self-guides or checklists for the students. She also found Physics and Chemistry areas were weak in respect to images, therefore, they needed an additional bank of images and clip arts.

Page 4

previous

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

next



Current Issue | Editorial Board | Reader Survey | Special Honors
Submissions |
Resources | Archive | Text Version | Email
NC State Homepage


Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal
a service of NC State University, Raleigh, NC
Volume 8, Issue 1, Winter 2005
ISSN 1097 9778
URL: http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/sum2002/ipt/4.html
Contact Meridian
All rights reserved by the authors.



Meridian is a member of the GEM Consortium