meridian
home current issue editorial board reader survey submissions archive


Image Processing for Teaching (IPT) in Science Classrooms

Kadriye O Lewis

Page 5

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6


Favorite activities in IPT

The Contour Map activity was the students' favorite, although the teacher found presenting it very difficult and complicated. The teacher's favorite activities were "Devil's Tower in 3-D" (Projecting topographic data/contour map) and "An Eagle's-Eye View" (Modeling an Alaskan volcano) from Earth & Space Science. Most of the students liked the "Devil's Tower in 3-D" best, since they enjoyed drawing their own contour maps. One of the students, Dan liked "An Eagle's-Eye View" because of his interest in rocks and mountains. Vera liked "Animal Hands" (Biology) best. Her explanation was:

"… The X-ray of the hands because I am an animal person, I love animals and that's just to see the different animal hands. I really like that (SI-8: CPS: Vera, p.11).

Only Mary did not have any favorite activities since she liked them all. Although the Contour Map activity was one of the most difficult for the students, I observed that they enjoyed doing this activity. Rick says:

"…[Activities] sometimes it is easy and sometimes it is hard. Animal bone was easy. I never used contour map before, that's why, it was hard" (SI-2: CPS: Rick, p.3).

Ms. Rose's recommendations and her future plan

Ms. Rose recommended the following concerning the IPT program:

  • IPT needs to have a source of clip art within the program. When users want to use the LUT table, just go and pull that out to use it.
  • Since some of the activities were too complicated, there needs to be a way to make directions easier. Cutting down the numbers of steps and processes that you have to go through to do certain things.
  • There is a need to sample some of the activities and extend the scientific process. The objectives were basically teacher-oriented, suggesting that the teacher needs to know what questions are going to be asked. What's the hypothesis? What is the next step?

She also was aware that her students did not have enough understanding of the program, which was due to the nature of the IPT software. Her future plan is to train her students in basic image processing skills and to try the Biology program the following year.

Limitations of the study

The study was limited by the following:

  • This study included one teacher and one classroom.
  • I did not get much information from some of the participants I interviewed. This may have been due to the lack of experience participants had with the kind of research studied.
  • The data consist of only nine interviews, four classroom observations (video taped), computer background questionnaire, and activity sheets.
  • Another limitation was establishing the validity and reliability for a research tool that has never been used. To minimize this limitation the content validity and face validity was established through a review of the interview questions by three seventh graders, a seventh grade teacher and one professor.

Summary of research findings and interpretation:

The following central concepts were developed from the analysis of the observations and the interviews with the teacher and students:

  • The teacher used the IPT software as a demonstration tool, introductory tool, assessment tool, and visual concepts both in the classroom and the computer lab.
  • According to the teacher, the preparation time for the IPT activities was time consuming. She also pointed out that some of the activities were too complicated and were difficult to understand.
  • Technology failure and frustration were experienced from time to time.
  • The students reported that learning with IPT was different from the regular science class since IPT was computer based instruction and they liked learning through the use of technology.
  • IPT made learning easier and faster through visual real life images, which enhanced the understanding of abstract concepts.
  • IPT had an impact on students' grades; especially low achievers who made significant improvement in their grades.
  • The students expressed their desire to use IPT more often or as much as possible.
  • The findings showed that students wanted to use IPT in other subject areas such as Social Studies, Language Arts and Math.
  • IPT did not have much impact on intercommunications within the class; however, due to the students' difficulties with the use of IPT, the students asked more questions of the teacher or their partners.
  • IPT was compatible with the curriculum and the Ohio State objectives in science teaching.
  • IPT had many strong capabilities such as animation, 3-D images, visual, images of real life objects, and a measuring tool. The most effective part of IPT was the measuring tool with the hands-on experience.
  • The use of IPT was highly motivational for the students, especially for those who had behavior problems and those who had been lower achievers.
  • IPT was the safest way to learn science without worrying about outside environmental conditions for these seventh graders.
  • IPT did not have sufficient guiding materials for either the teacher and the students.
  • Physics and Chemistry areas were weak in terms of images.

General implications

The present investigation was directed at revealing the implementation, effectiveness of the software, and the patterns of interaction between the students and the IPT software. This study's analysis was also directed at revealing the constructivist paradigm and visual learning in the nature of the IPT software designs. It is stressed that in research of this nature, the numbers of concepts are of critical importance, and not the number of subjects studied, or the number of responses obtained.

The seventh grade middle school students in this science class demonstrated their understanding of science concepts using IPT in real-world situations although they did not understand the technological basis of this image-processing program. IPT as a tool in science classrooms helped students understand abstract concepts by making them visual and manipulative. It also helped them develop complex ideas by manipulating images and constructing the meaning from these data.

CONCLUSION

IPT has a strong potential in increasing learning science. IPT enables self-paced learning with sensitivity to different learning styles and continuous assessment of student progress. However, the teacher and students' experience with the IPT software offer insight into the problems encountered in the IPT technology. The needs of the teacher and students as the end-user of the IPT technology and their perceptions are important to the improvement of this software in the respect of the user interface, student oriented materials and others. However, the teacher and the students' utilization of IPT technology have the potential to solve the problems with more practice and training. Using IPT more often seems to affect student learning positively. The experiences of the teacher and the student who use IPT helped identify, innovate, and incorporate these evolving technologies into learning science and hands-on experience with real life objects.

Students can develop their analytical, behavioral and visual learning skills based on the fact that people learn best a) by doing; b) when they can actively use the information; and c) when they are intrinsically motivated by the material and its challenges. The IPT approach is designed to incorporate and transcend the best aspects of current image processing teaching methodologies. However, the user- interface and the complexity of some activities made it a little difficult for these seventh graders to use this software individually without getting much help from the teacher.

Recommendations

Reiterating, my research was limited in scope, namely one class for approximately two months must preface any recommendations. My first recommendation is to expand this research, not only in time to at least six months, but also one other middle school. Based on my observations and my interviews, I recommend the following:

  • Based on the teacher's opinion, students should be trained in Image Processing Basic Skills to make students more aware of this kind of data in IPT.
  • Students should understand and increase their awareness of the applications of IPT from various perspectives. This increased awareness may help students explore science-related careers.
  • By providing useful student oriented materials in IPT to discover information, new users would have a more positive experience and continue to use it without much help from the teacher.
  • To be better educated in the use of IPT, the Image Processing Center should provide extra guidance for both students and teachers.
  • Since the sample size was small, the research findings pointed to a need for the further investigation concerning the effectiveness of this software in other classes or schools.
  • Ongoing research in this field needs to be established to determine whether IPT is providing effective long-term learning.
  • The user interface of IPT is an area that needs attention as stated previously. Thus, the user interface aspect of this software is worth investigating.
  • Considering the use of IPT as having potential to increase motivation of students to learn science, it can be integrated in middle school curriculum on the condition that more student-oriented materials are provided.

Page 5

previous

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

next



Current Issue | Editorial Board | Reader Survey | Special Honors
Submissions |
Resources | Archive | Text Version | Email
NC State Homepage


Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal
a service of NC State University, Raleigh, NC
Volume 8, Issue 1, Winter 2005
ISSN 1097 9778
URL: http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/sum2002/ipt/5.html
Contact Meridian
All rights reserved by the authors.



Meridian is a member of the GEM Consortium