Anderson-Inman, L., &
Ditson, L. (1999). Computer-based concept mapping: A tool for negotiating
meaning. [Electronic version]. Learning & Leading with Technology,
26(8), 6-13.
Anderson-Inman, L., Ditson,
L. A., & Ditson, M.T. (1998). Computer-based concept mapping:
Promoting meaningful learning in science for students with disabilities.
Information Technology and Disabilities [Online serial], 5(1-2).
Retrieved June 3, 2002, from: http://www.rit.edu/~easi/itd/itdv05n1-2/article2.html
Anderson-Inman, L., &
Horney, M. (1996). Computer-based concept mapping: Enhancing literacy
with tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent & Adult
Literacy, 40(4), 302-306.
Anderson-Inman, L., &
Zeitz, L. (1993). Computer-based concept mapping: Active studying
for active learner. The Computer Teacher, 6-8, 10-11.
Anderson-Inman, L., &
Zeitz, L. (1994). Beyond notecards: Synthesizing information with
electronic study Tools. The Computing Teacher, 21(8), 21-25.
Applebee, A., Langer, J.,
Mullis, I., Latham, A., & Gentile, C. (1994). National Assessment
of Educational Progress 1992: Writing Report Card. Washington, DC:
U.S. Government Printing
Office.
Avery, P. G., Baker, J,
& Gross, S. H. (1996). “Mapping” learning at the secondary level.
The Social Studies, 87(5), 217-222. Retrieved September 20,
2002, from MasterFILE Premier database.
Blair, R. B., Ormsbee,
C., & Brandes, J. (2002). Using writing strategies and visual
thinking software to enhance the written performance of students with
mild disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED463125).
Bourdin, B., & Fayol,
M. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental
approach. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13,
183-196.
Brodney, B., Reeves, C.,
& Kazelskis, R. (1999). Selected prewriting treatments: Effects
on expository written by fifth-grade students. The Journal of Experimental
Education, 68(1), 5-20. Retrieved September 21, 2002, from MasterFILE
Premier database.
Brukhalter, N (1995). A
Vygotsky-based curriculum for teaching persuasive writing in the elementary
grades. Language Arts, 72(3), 192-199.
Chang, K., Sung, Y., &
Chen, S. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with
scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17,
21-33.
Dabbagh, N. (2001). Concept
mapping as a mindtool for critical thinking. Journal of Computing
in Teacher Education, 17(2), 16-24.
Ditson, L. A., Kessler,
R., Anderson-Inman, L., & Mafit, D. (2001). Concept mapping
companion (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: The International
Society for Technology in Education.
Ferry, B., Hedberg, J.,
& Harper, B. (1997). How do preservice teachers use concept maps
to organize their curriculum content knowledge? Retrieved March 20,
2004, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/papers/Ferry/Ferry.html
First, C. G., & Macmillan,
B. (1995). Writing process versatility. Intervention in School
&Clinic, 31(1), 21-27. Retrieved September 21, 2002, from
EBSCOhost Research database.
Flower, L. S. & Hayes,
J. R. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process. In C.H. Frederiksen,
M.F. Whiteman, & J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature
of development, and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum Associates.
Freedman, A., & Pringle,
I. (1984). Why students can’t write arguments. English in Education,
18, 73-84.
Guastello, E. F., Beasley,
T.M. & Sinatra, R. C. (2000, November/December). Concept mapping
effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city
seventh graders. Remedial & Special Education, 21(6), 356-364.
Retrieved October 30, 2002, from EBSCO Research database.
Hart, J. (1997). Prewriting.
Editor & Publisher, 130(7), 17. Retrieved June 3, 2002,
from MasterFILE Premier database.
Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986).
Research on writing composition: New direction for teaching.
Urbana, IL: National Conference
on Research in English.
Hillocks, G. Jr. (2002).
The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning.
New York: Teachers College Press.
Idaho Department of Education.
(1999). Direct Writing Assessment. Retrieved February 19, 2003, from
http://www.sde.state.id.us/instruct/schoolaccount/performancesummary/dwa.htm
*
Jonassen, D. H. (1996).
Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jonassen, D. H., Carr,
C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging
learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24-32. Retrieved
March 18, 2003, from http://tiger.coe.missouri.edu/~jonassen/Mindtools.pdf
Jonassen, D. H., Reeves,
T. C. Hong, N., Harvey, D. & Peters, K. (1997). Concept mapping
as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive
Learning Research, 8(3/4), 289-308.
Kessler, R., Ditson, L.,
A., Anderson-Inman, L., & Morris, J. D. (1996). Evaluating concept
maps in traditional and electronic environment: Inter-rater reliability
and beyond. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association
Conference, New York, NY.
Knudson, R. E. (1992).
Analysis of argumentative writing at two grade levels. Journal
of Educational Research, 85(3), 169-179.
Margerum-Leys, J.
(1999). Concept mapping as a prewriting activity: A presentation for
MACUL 99. Retrieved September 20, 2002, from
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jmargeru/conceptmap/learninggoals.htm
McCann, T. M. (1989). Student
argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels.
Research in the Teaching of English, 23(1), 62-76.
McMillan, J. H. (2000).
Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. New York:
Addison Wesley Longman.
Nippold, M. (2000, February).
Language development during the adolescent years:
Pragmatics, syntax, and
semantics. Topics in Language Disorder, 15-28. Retrieved May20,
2003, from MasterFILE Premier database.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin,
D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Okebukola, P. A. O., &
Atkinson, P. (1992). Can good concept mappers be good problem solvers
in science? Research in Science & Technological Education,
10(2), 153 - 169. Retrieved October 30, 2002, from MasterFILE
Premier database.
Plotnick, E. (2001). A
graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts.
Teacher Librarian, 28(4), 42-44. Retrieved September 20, 2002,
from MasterFILe Premier
database.
Scardamalia, M., &
Bereiter, C. (1986). Written composition. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),
Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778-803).
New York: Macmillan.
Schau, C., Mattern, N.,
Zeilik, M., Teague, K. W., & Weber, R. J. (2001, February).
Select-and-fill-in concept
map scores as a measure of students’ connected understanding of science.
Educational & Psychology Measurement, 61(1), 136-158. Retrieved
March 13, 2002, from MasterFILE Premier database.
Sinatra, R.C. (2000, May/Jun).
Teaching learners to think, read, and write more effectively in content
subjects. Clearing House, 73(5), 266-273. Retrieved December
5, 2002, from MasterFILE Premier database.
Sturm J.M., & Rankin-Erickson,
J. L. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated concept
mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning
disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2),
124-139.
Toulmin, S. E. (1958).
The use of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1997, Spring).
Research on genre-specific strategies for enhancing writing in adolescents
with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20,
140-159.
Zipprich, M. A. (1995).
Teaching web making as a guided planning tool to improve student narrative
writing. Remedial & Special Education, 16(1), 3-16. Retrieved
December 16, 2002, from MasterFILE Premier database.
