| Table of Contents | About Meridian | Resources | Archive |
 

 

Internet Tools for Facilitating Scientific Inquiry

Richard A. Huber
Watson School of Education
University of North Carolina-Wilmington

and

Christopher J. Moore
Saint Mary Catholic School
Wilmington, North Carolina

 

 

Abstract

Effective use of the Internet in K-12 science education may have little or nothing to do with surfing the web. In this paper we examine another way of using the Internet in inquiry-based middle school science classrooms--using Internet resources that provide relevant databases along with useful and engaging tools for exploring and interpreting the data. Specifically, in this paper we discuss the educational applications of two Internet utilities that use water quality data to facilitate teachers and students developing various science process skills.

 

 

"...the most productive and effective science education applications of the Internet involve teachers and students accessing specific pre-selected sites in order to accomplish pre-determined objectives."

 

 

 

Contrary to a common misconception, effective use of the Internet in K-12 science education has little or nothing to do with surfing the web. Quite the contrary, the most productive and effective science education applications of the Internet involve teachers and students accessing specific pre-selected sites in order to accomplish pre-determined objectives (Huber and Harriett, 1998; Moore and Huber, in press; Watson, 1999). This is not to imply, however, that the Internet should not be used to support relatively open-ended inquiry-based instructional approaches. Such approaches are essential because students learn only by constructing their own conceptualizations -- that is by making their own meaningful connections between what they already know and the new information they encounter (Martin 2000). Fitzgerald, Buie & Cuales (1998) draw upon Tufte's (1983) seminal work on the visual display of quantitative information in a discussion of how "elegant" and "transparent" interfaces of computerized displays of quantitative graphics can facilitate users in drawing such personal meaning from the displayed information. In a similar vein, Huber and Harriett (1998) describe the following three inquiry-based types of Internet-supported science instruction, all of which are constructivist oriented:

(1) the use of daily access sites, which are comparable to "newspaper in the classroom" programs;

(2) virtual field trips; and

(3) Internet-based projects.

All of these approaches, especially Internet-based projects, are highly compatible with the goals of constructivist-oriented inquiry-based science instruction (Moore and Huber, in press).

   

In this paper we examine another way of using the Internet in inquiry-based middle school science classrooms--using Internet resources that provide relevant databases along with useful and engaging tools for exploring and interpreting the data. Specifically, in this paper we discuss the educational applications of two Internet utilities that use water quality data to facilitate teachers and students developing various science process skills. The resources are particularly useful in helping students build strengths in the areas of

(1) manipulating, visualizing and interpreting data;

(2) making and testing scientific hypotheses; and

(3) practicing scientific inquiry.

Each of the Internet utilities reviewed in this paper provides access to a substantial database. "Water on the Web"
(http://wow.nrri.umn.edu/wow/index.html) contains data on lakes and the "River Run"
(http://www.uncwil.edu/riverrun/) contains data on rivers. Additionally, each utility offers powerful data manipulation and processing tools appropriate for use by middle school students. The tools allow teachers and students to generate animated graphic displays showing relationships among water quality parameters through space and time. These displays use line graphs and color gradients to display data on multiple water quality parameters while also animating the graphs, displaying a sequential series of graphs, in order to show changes through time. The animated graphs function much like a computerized enhanced version of the "small multiples" described by Tufte (1983; 1990) as highly effective means of displaying complex, multi-variable, quantitative information.

Water on the Web
(http://wow.nrri.umn.edu/wow/index.html)

River Run
(http://www.uncwil.edu/riverrun/)

   
  Among the strengths of these utilities is the fact that they provide Internet-based tools supportive of inquiry-based science instruction. Although there is no universally accepted concise definition of the term "inquiry-based science instruction," there is broad general consensus regarding the fundamental nature and value of inquiry-based instruction. Strong support for inquiry-based instruction has been articulated by the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the National Commission on Science Education Standards and Assessment (NCSESA), and the National Research Council (NRC). The nature of inquiry-based instruction is perhaps most clearly described in the "vision" of the National Science Education Standards, published under the auspices of the National Research Council (1996). As envisioned in the Standards, inquiry-based teachers function as facilitators and supporters of student learning rather than as disseminators of knowledge. The vision of the Standards is one of dynamic learning communities working within enriched learning environments supported by an educational system that has been overhauled to provide the support those communities will need. Within these learning communities, students are actively engaged in cooperative, inquiry-driven, experiential, "hands-on and minds-on" learning activities that emphasize problem solving and creative thinking. Through these experiences, curriculum goals and objectives are met as students construct meaningful, broadly applicable, well-structured, information-rich knowledge, skills, abilities, and affective domain attributes. Within this setting, the Standards recognize the symbiotic nature of science and technology and science- and technology- education. The response to the Standards has been strong and supportive (Moore and Huber, in press; Loucks-Horsley, 1998; Zeidler, 1998; Bereiter, Scardamalia, Cassells, and Hewitt, 1997; Collins, 1997; Mergendoller, 1997; Bybee and Champagne 1995; Bybee 1995; Pratt 1995; Riechard, 1994).
 
To Page 2 of 5

| Download .pdf file of this entire article (Acrobat Reader needed for viewing) |

Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal
a service of NC State University, Raleigh, NC
Volume 4, Issue 1, Winter 2001
ISSN 1097 -9778
URL: http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2001/internet/index.htm
contact Meridian
All rights reserved by the author.


| Table of Contents | Review Board | Resources | Archive |