meridian
home current issue editorial board reader survey submissions archive


Internet Filtering: The Effects in a Middle and High School Setting

Deborah G. Simmons

Page 3

1 | 2 | 3
print this article email this article save this article


 

Implications and Conclusions

The study results indicated that further studies might examine how middle and high school students feel about Internet filtering, and whether they perceive it as a barrier to academic success. Also, results showed that teachers should meet with administrators to discuss ways to minimize the impact that Internet filtering has upon learning so that academic opportunities are maximized.


This study was conducted to determine the effects of Internet filtering and restricted Internet access in a school system and its effect on teaching and learning. It determined that although some students may break rules that have been set to protect them from harmful or indecent material that is available on the Internet, administrators should try to find other creative disciplinary methods to reduce such violations. This would eliminate restrictive measures such as a total ban to Internet access because findings indicate that productivity is reduced, and it negatively impacts job performance among teachers and administrators. These findings might add to the scope of opinions regarding the appropriateness of Internet filtering rather than to a total ban of Internet access in the classroom and the school environment.

 

About the Author

Deborah Simmons is a graduate student in Instructional Technology/Library Media at Georgia College and State University in Milledgeville, GA.
dgsim@bellsouth.net

Send correspondence to:
Department of Education
Instructional Technology/Library Media
Box 31061
Georgia College & State University
Milledgeville, GA 31061


References

Children’s Internet Protection Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-554 (codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 6801, 9134 (2001); 47 U.S.C. § 254 (2001)).

Commission on Child Online Protection. (2000, October). Final report of the COPA Commission to Congress. Retrieved June 15, 2004, from COPA Commission Web site: http://www.copacommission.com/report/

The Communications Decency Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 223) (2001 & Supp. 2004).

Mehlinger, H. D. (1996). School reform in the information age. [Electronic version.] Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 400-407. Retrieved March 22, 2004 from Academic Search Premier database.

National Center for Education Statistics, Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994-2001 (September 2002) available at http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002018.pdf.

Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997).

Rumbough, T.B. (2001). Paper Mills, Pornography, and Pirating: College Students and the Internet: Controversial Uses of the Internet by College Students. Retrieved March 16, 2004, from EDUCAUSE Web site: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/CSD1618.pdf

Schofield, J., & Davidson, A. (2003). The impact of Internet use on relationships between teachers and students. [Electronic version.] Mind, Culture, and Activity. 10(1), 62-79. Retrieved March 19, 2003 from Academic Search Premier database.

Shiveley, J. & VanFossen, P. (1999). Critical thinking and the Internet: Opportunities for the social studies classroom. [Electronic version.] The Social Studies, 90(1), 42-46. Retrieved March 19, 2004 from Academic Search Premier database.

U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1999, September). How access benefits children: Connecting our kids to the world of information. Retrieved March 19, 2004 from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/otiahome/top/publicationmedia/How_ABC/How_ABC.html

U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2002, February). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Retrieved March 14, 2004 from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/index.html.

U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Adminsitration. (1999, September). How access benefits children: Connecting our kids to the world of information. Retrieved March 14, 2004 from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/otiahome/top/publicationmedia/How_ABC/How_ABC.html

U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2003, August). Report to Congress: Children’s Internet protection act, study of technology protection measures (Publication No. L. 106-554). Retrieved March 14, 2004, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/ntiageneral/cipa2003/CIPAreport_08142003.htm

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002, September). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2001 (NCES 2002-018) Retrieved March 14, 2004 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002018.pdf

Yumuk, A. (2002). Letting go of control to the learners: The role of the Internet in promoting a more autonomous view of learning in an academic translation course. [Electronic version]. Educational Research, 44, 141-156. Retrieved March 14, 2003 from Academic Search Premier database.

 


Appendix

Internet Filter Survey

To prevent offensive online content, to safeguard children, some schools have enacted software designed to filter offensive material. The purpose of this survey is to examine teacher and administrative staff perceptions about filtering information online in school. Survey responses remain anonymous and help to fulfill my graduate requirements.


1. What is your area of expertise?

Computer Technology__ Social Studies__ Science ___ Math ___ History___ Geography ___ Library Media ___ Foreign Language___ Admin. Staff___ Principal___

2. How many years of computer experience do you have?

1-3 ___ 3-5 ___ 5 or more___

3. What is your gender?

Male ___ Female ___

4. How often do you use the Internet?

Daily ___
Several times a week ___
Weekly ___
Monthly ___
Never ___

5. What kinds of tasks do you perform on the Internet?

E-mail ___ Research ___ Attendance ___ Grades ___ Distance learning for self___ Communicate with students at home ___ Create instructional materials ___

6. Is filter software installed on all the computers at your school?

Yes ___ No ___

7. Do you use techniques to get around the filter program?

Yes ___ No ___

8. Have any tasks been jeopardized since the software was installed?

Yes ___ No ___

9. Do you design lesson plans that integrate technology into the lesson?

Yes ___ No ___

10. Do you have technical support at your school?

Yes ___ No ___

11. Are legitimate sites blocked because the filter program is installed on the computers?

Yes___ No ___

12. Has the filter program eliminated offensive web sites?

Yes ___ No ___

13. Are students required to sign a computer user agreement?

Yes ___ No ___

14. Are students punished for downloading offensive material?

Yes ___ No ___

15. Please provide your comments about blocking Internet access in schools?





 

 

Page 3

previous

1 | 2 | 3
print this article email this article save this article

next



Current Issue | Editorial Board | Reader Survey | Special Honors
Submissions |
Resources | Archive | Text Version | Email
NC State Homepage


Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal
a service of NC State University, Raleigh, NC
Volume 8, Issue 1, Winter 2005
ISSN 1097 9778
URL: http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2005/Internet filtering/3.html
Contact Meridian
All rights reserved by the authors.



Meridian is a member of the GEM Consortium