|
Media
Contact:
Dr. JoAnn
Burkholder, 919/515-3421
Tim Lucas, News
Services, 919/515-3470
Oct.
22, 2002
New Findings
Reconfirm Toxicity of Pfiesteria Cultures
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
A
team of experts has refuted previous findings published
last summer stating that Pfiesteria is not toxic
to fish or humans. When they cultured the same strain
of P. shumwayae studied by the dissenting scientists,
it produced a toxin that killed fish within minutes.
Dr.
JoAnn Burkholder, director of North
Carolina State University's Center for Applied Aquatic
Ecology, presented the results of the new study
Tuesday at the 10th International Conference on Harmful
Algae in St. Petersburg, Fla. The findings are significant
because they reconfirm a decade of research showing
that Pfiesteria is a dangerous toxic organism.
Last
summer's papers had been critical of work by Burkholder
and other scientists who discovered Pfiesteria
and described its life cycle and toxic impacts on fish
and mammals. However, the dissenting scientists' work
was based primarily on research with one strain. In
the new study three laboratories, assisted in toxin
analysis by a fourth "blind" lab, have shown
that this allegedly nontoxic strain does produce toxin
after all. Burkholder said that their team's results
differed because they grew the culture under conditions
that allowed it to express toxicity.
"I
hope these findings finally help set the record straight
by addressing the widespread misinformation about this
issue during the past few months," Burkholder said.
"Growing these cultures is very complex and difficult
work. We are entirely confident that the strain we have
tested, taken from the very same culture they used,
is toxic and dangerous."
Populations
or strains of Pfiesteria, like other toxic algae,
are known to vary in toxicity. There are strains that
can kill fish with toxin and benign strains that cannot.
More than 50 peer-reviewed science articles have been
published about toxic Pfiesteria, in cross-confirmed
research based on more than 400 toxic strains and 200
nontoxic strains.
Careful
review of the culture methods used in last summer's
studies raised concerns among Burkholder, Drs. Andrew
Gordon and Harold Marshall at Old Dominion University,
and Dr. Alan Lewitus at the University of South Carolina.
"We
were surprised to find that these scientists extrapolated
beyond their data from just one strain to all strains
of Pfiesteria, even to both species," Burkholder
explained. "Pfiesteria is difficult to culture
in actively toxic mode, and their methods did not follow
the only standard procedure that has worked so far in
producing toxic Pfiesteria. We decided to re-test
that strain of Pfiesteria shumwayae using the
standard protocol."
The
P. shumwayae strain had been grown with algal
prey for two years. In previous research, all but four
of the 400 toxic strains examined by Burkholder and
other specialists on toxic Pfiesteria had rapidly
lost their ability to make toxin when they were not
grown with live fish. Therefore, the team led by Burkholder
expected that the strain would not be able to produce
toxin.
The
three laboratories grew this strain in standardized
fish bioassays. They compared mortality of juvenile
tilapia grown with the test strain of Pfiesteria
shumwayae, versus tilapia grown with a known toxic
strain. Some control fish were grown with a known nontoxic
Pfiesteria strain, while others were maintained
without any Pfiesteria. Once the strain was rapidly
killing fish, it was re-isolated from the fish cultures
and grown with algae for several weeks so that pure
culture, without fish and associated contaminating microbes,
could also be tested for any remaining toxicity.
"When
we used the standardized method with this P. shumwayae
strain, it responded to fish very quickly," said
Lewitus. Within a few days the culture was killing fish
at low to moderate cell densities of 800-5000 cells
per milliliter. Fish died at comparable rates when exposed
to the known toxic strain, but all control fish remained
healthy.
"With
the nontoxic control strain, even at very high densities
of 40,000 cells per milliliter, there was no fish death
or apparent stress," said Marshall, "although
there was some physical attack."
The scientists then sent samples to toxin specialists
Drs. John Ramsdell and Peter Moeller at the NOAA-National
Ocean Service Marine Biotoxins Program in Charleston,
S.C., for toxin analysis. The toxin specialists analyzed
them "blind," without knowing the identity
of the samples. A potent water-soluble toxin was detected
from the test P. shumwayae strain grown with
fish and in pure culture with algae - the same toxin
that was found in the known toxic strain. Both the cells
and the surrounding water in which the test strain was
grown contained toxin. No toxin was found in the negative
controls.
These
new data show that the scientists who reported that
Pfiesteria is not toxic actually had a toxic
strain all along. "Toxic Pfiesteria strains
are widespread and easily found in many estuaries,"
said Burkholder. "The controversy here is not a
culture availability issue. This multi-laboratory study
shows that it is, instead, a culturing issue. It is
really important for laboratories to use procedures
that allow Pfiesteria to express toxicity."
At
the same conference on Thursday, Gordon and Marshall
will present related research showing that when some
strains of toxic P. shumwayae and other microbes
are removed from fish-killing cultures by filtration,
the filtrate kills fish. This indicates a toxic effect
of Pfiesteria
without physical contact. Dr. Mac Law, a veterinary
fish pathologist at NC State, found that fish exposed
to the toxic filtrate developed skin lesions, showing
that Pfiesteria can cause these sores without
physical attack.
New
findings about Pfiesteria toxin will also be
presented at the Florida meeting this week. Ramsdell
and Moeller will describe novel rapid purification methods
that they used to obtain information on the toxin's
chemical structure. They also isolated toxin from pure
cultures of toxic Pfiesteria, grown without live
fish. When test fish were exposed to the toxin, they
died in minutes.
Other
new research, conducted by Dr. Edward Levin of Duke
University, will highlight impacts of Pfiesteria
toxin on mammals. When Levin injected this Pfiesteria
toxin into the hippocampus of live rats, they developed
severe learning deficits, supporting previous studies
that have linked toxic Pfiesteria with profound
learning disabilities in rats and humans.
-30-
|