|
Positive Points
The title asks a provocative question, and the subtitle
defines the focus of inquiry.
Succinct introduction of issues, leading to clear objectives.
Methods are concise.
Graphs are interpreted by their short text boxes -
helps viewers move through poster more quickly.
Results and conclusions are concise and relate
back to objectives.
Vertical lines and numbered headings make flow clear.
Results are centerpiece of poster and heavily graphic.
Main points in "Discussion" are bolded, obvious, and articulated clearly.
|
|
Negative Points
Author information should be larger.
Large image of manatee is low-resolution and heavily pixelated on full-size poster.
Graph fonts are too small.
Introduction could be improved by bulleting.
Bullets are too far from text. This is a poor MicroSoft default - move them closer.
Better name for Section 5 would be "Conclusions."
|
