
Plant physiologist Joe Miller (left) and
plant pathologist Allen Heagle discuss
an experiment on the effects of elevated
carbon dioxide and ozone on soybeans.
(K7443-17)
|
Concentrations of carbon dioxide in our
air are on the rise. During this
century, CO2 levels are
expected to double what they were in preindustrial times.
Rising CO2 stimulates
growth and increases yield in a variety
of food and fiber crops. But will yields
surge enough to feed the world's
population of 9 billion expected by
2050?
To find out, scientists have
developed computer models for each of
the major crops—mainly grains. "We use
models to project the effects of both
rising CO2 and projected
climate changes on world food supply,"
says Cynthia Rosenzweig. She heads the
project at NASA's Goddard Institute for
Space Studies at Columbia University in
New York City.
New
ARS research suggests that the
models may often overestimate how much
CO2 enrichment will stimulate
growth. The scientists are proposing
that another gas be included in the
models: the air pollutant ozone. This
oxidizing agent damages plant tissue and
decreases crop yield.
"But studies to measure the positive
effects of CO2 and the
negative effects of ground-level ozone
on crop yield have traditionally looked
at each gas separately," says plant
physiologist Joseph E. Miller. He is the
head of ARS' Air Quality-Plant Growth
and Development Unit in Raleigh, North
Carolina.
Miller and colleagues Allen S.
Heagle, Edwin L. Fiscus, and Fitzgerald
L. Booker have been combining the two
gases in various concentrations on
several crops throughout the growing
season. The results suggest that much of
the CO2 yield boost reported
by other researchers may not be true
increases but rather a case of CO2
preventing losses caused by ozone—at
least in ozone-sensitive crops.
"When ozone stress is low, increasing
CO2 concentration does not
always stimulate plant growth a lot,"
says Heagle. Extra CO2 by
itself will cause some growth
stimulation because the plants have more
"food" for photosynthesis.
So far, the researchers have seen
this interaction in field tests of
soybeans, winter wheat, rice, and cotton
and in greenhouse tests of snap bean and
white clover—a forage crop. Each crop or
variety responds to a greater or lesser
degree, depending on its sensitivity to
each gas, but the trend is always the
same.
Soybeans are quite sensitive to
ozone, as is cotton, Miller notes. And
some varieties of wheat and rice also
suffer damage and yield loss under high
ozone.
Other researchers have reported a
similar interaction between CO2
and water stress. Some crops don't
respond as much to high CO2
when they get ample water throughout the
growing season, says Heagle.
He explains that extra CO2
partially closes the leaf pores, or
stomates, through which plants exchange
gases. This reduces the ozone that gets
in and the water vapor that gets out.
"So if plants are under ozone or water
stress, you'll get a greater response to
CO2 enrichment. The more
ozone stress, the more damage prevention
and the greater the apparent growth
stimulation."
"It doesn't seem to matter what ozone
damage we measure—photosynthesis, foliar
injury, or yield—all are prevented by CO2,"
says Heagle. "The greater the ozone
stress, the greater the amount of CO2
that will be needed to prevent it, and
it's not necessarily a linear
relationship."
Why do some experiments show greater
response to elevated CO2 than
others? "It may be due to unrecognized
differences in water or ozone stress
among different studies," says Miller.
The Raleigh findings have CO2
researcher Bruce A. Kimball scratching
his head. Kimball, who heads ARS'
Environmental and Plant Dynamics
Research Unit in Phoenix, Arizona, says
that many of the studies reporting yield
increases from CO2 enrichment
were probably performed at low ozone
levels.
"I think the CO2
stimulation [the Raleigh researchers]
are getting in low ozone is generally
lower than what is reported in the
literature," says Kimball.
Steven J. Britz, who heads the Climate
Stress Laboratory in Beltsville,
Maryland, adds, "The Raleigh experiments
are a good example that the field of CO2
response is still very much in
development."—By
Judy McBride, Agricultural
Research Service Information Staff.
This research is part of Global
Change, an ARS National Program (#204)
described on the World Wide Web at
http://www.nps.ars.usda.gov/programs/nrsas.htm.
Fitzgerald Booker, Plant Science
Research Unit, 3908 Inwood Rd.,
Raleigh, NC 27603; phone (919) 515-9495,
fax (919) 515-3593. |