|

Background
In March
2004 our study team received a request from the Forest Supervisor
on the Santa
Fe National Forest (SFNF), Gilbert Zepeda, to revisit
the case study and update it. From the time of completion
of our initial study in January 2003 several new developments
with the Santa Fe Municipal Watershed Project (SFMWP) had
occurred, which the Forest Supervisor wished to have documented.
We agreed that accurately representing the Santa
Fe Municipal Watershed Project Case Study was in the
best interest of both our research project and the USFS.
In March 2004 Ginger Kunkel returned to the site to document
progress, conducted additional interviews and collected
additional supporting material.
Santa
Fe Municipal Watershed Project Update
Northwest
of the City resides the Santa Fe Watershed, a 17,520 acre
municipal watershed, a mostly uninhabited
site. Out of the 17,520 acres encompassing the watershed,
the SFNF is responsible for 15,493. Half of the SFNF acreage
is located in the Pecos Wilderness, where thinning is banned,
and therefore off limits to any treatment. The City of Santa
Fe owns 1,124 acres. The Randall Davey Audubon Society owns
135 acres and The Nature Conservancy owns 290 acres. The
remaining 478 acres are owned by private residents. SFMWP
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was the product of
a stakeholder process and focused predominantly on ecosystem
restoration in 7,270 acres within the watershed. The EIS
was completed in 2001, and in a nutshell, the prescription
thins the forest from below, followed by low intensity prescribed
burning. The 7,270 acres of treatment were estimated to
cost approximately $10,000,0000, with the project taking
between 5-10 years. The project called for 700-1,000 acres
per year to be treated. The USFS hired a contractor, Don
Peterson from Montana, to carry out the mechanical and hand
thinning. The USFS pays Peterson $945/acre. The project
was to be implemented in phases and the effects were to
be monitored to allow an adaptive management approach to
restore the watershed to sustainable conditions.
When we
conducted our site visit in January 2003 only 18 acres had
been treated. The biggest problems we identified were complacency
within the USFS about timely and accurate implementation of
the SFMWP Plan and failure of the community within and around
Santa Fe to hold the Forest Service accountable. Since our
visit in January 2001 much has happened with the SFMWP. |