March 1998
 
 
PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CURRICULUM PORTFOLIO REVIEW
                    Department :_______________________
                    Curriculum Code:___________________
Note:  The proposal includes possible accessibility via the World Wide Web, on a secure server.  This section would be linked to the departmental home page)
Date of last review:  _____________________________
Date of current review: ___________________________
Current review activity of any courses (list all): __________
 
The following guidelines represent the minimum acceptable for a five-year curriculum review.  Many of the required sections are also needed for compliance with institutional accreditation criteria of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS).  Additional materials can be added to the appendices but not to the format provided below.  All departmental reviews must follow this standard format.  The Curriculum Portfolio should be kept up to date for any changes in courses.
****
                                                Curriculum Code
Index
Curriculum Rationale
Mission and Strategic Environment
Curriculum Description Outcomes Assessment Plans 
 
Faculty
 
Degree Criteria and Requirements
Curriculum Description, Display and Requirement
 
Nontraditional Course Delivery
 
Accreditation Organizations
 
Course Lists
 
Assessment Modes
Assessment Methodologies
 
Impact of Assessment
Curriculum Performance Criteria
Statistical Data
In Appendix 6, provide the following statistical and trend data on the curriculum over the last 5 (this figure may vary depending upon departmental outside review time frames) years, as obtained from University Planning and Analysis. Indicate if from another source.
 
Discussion of Trends
List of Teaching Faculty
 
Curriculum Portfolio Summary
Summary and Recommendations
 
Additional Resources Requeste
In all areas of the curriculum and in any service courses, indicate what additional resources are needed over the next 5 years to:
Use Appendix 7 for any significant supporting documentation.
 
 
 
 CHECKLIST FOR COLLEGE COURSES AND CURRICULA COMMITTEE

Are annual curriculum assessment portfolios in evidence?
Year 1       ___Yes        ___No
Year 2       ___Yes        ___No
Year 3       ___Yes        ___No
Year 4       ___Yes        ___No
Year 5       ___Yes        ___No

For each of the following areas, rate the adequacy of assessment processes as evidenced in this curriculum review in terms of level of assurance offered that the processes in place will be used for continuous improvement.  Circle one number for each area. For service courses and distance education courses, check "not applicable" if the department does not have such offerings.

Assessment in the Major
    Adequate    5    4    3    2    1        Inadequate

Assessment of General Education Requirements
    Adequate    5    4    3    2    1        Inadequate

Performance Indicators
    Adequate    5    4    3    2    1        Inadequate

Assessment of Service Courses
    Adequate    5    4    3    2    1        Inadequate        Not Applicable

Assessment of Distance Education Courses
    Adequate    5    4    3    2    1        Inadequate        Not Applicable

Overall Adequacy of Assessment
    Adequate    5    4    3    2    1        Inadequate
 

Is a thorough analysis of annual portfolios in evidence?

What was the departmental response to the findings?

Were specific issues targeted for evaluation during curriculum review?

Has the curriculum identified a plan for future evaluation?

Is clear evidence offered that the department uses assessment results to improve the curriculum?
 

APPROVED        Departmental Courses and Curricula Committee
______________________________________________________

APPROVED        Department Head
______________________________________________________

APPROVED        College Courses and Curricula Committee
______________________________________________________

APPROVED        Dean
_______________________________________________________
 
 
 

CHECK LIST FOR UNIVERSITY COURSES AND CURRICULA COMMITTEE (UCCC)

1.  How many of the required curriculum assessment processes and performance indicators were addressed in the curriculum review?

2.    What is the overall adequacy of assessment processes as presented in this curriculum review?

3.    Overall, has a substantive review been done of this curriculum?