Harmful Algae  Pfiesteria  Other Estuarine   Marine  Freshwater

Research of Harmful Algae

Dinoflagellates are important members of the plankton (and less often, the benthos) of freshwater, brackish, and marine waters (~90% are brackish and marine). They are the dominant primary producers of the tropical and subtropical oceans (also abundant in late spring/summer plankton of temperate and subarctic seas), but heterotrophy and symbiosis are highly developed as well.

Although most are planktonic, benthic species include some of the most ecologically important organisms in the world, such as the "zooxanthellae" species that help to form coral reefs. Most are microscopic, but the largest are about 2 mm in diameter (the largest were known to the ancient Greeks, and some species were formally described by Muller in the late 1700s). While the best known morphs are flagellated, dinoflagellates may also be coccoid, filamentous, palmelloid, or amoeboid.

Among about 3,000 species, only about 70 have toxic strains. The toxins include some of the most potent biotoxins known. Dinoflagellates have been linked to major fish kills in many regions of the world. CAAE researchers are examining factors leading to initiation and development of harmful dinoflagellate blooms, and impacts of these blooms on other aquatic organisms.

During the past decade we have published extensively on the life history, ecology, and impacts of the toxigenic dinoflagellates, Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae. We are also actively engaged in the study of other toxigenic dinoflagellates such as Karlodinium veneficum, Prorocentrum minimum and Alexandrium monilatum.

Research in Estuarine Ecosystems
Various Harmful Species in the Neuse Estuary:

A recent Ph.D. dissertation completed at the CAAE used a continuous, 13- year record of environmental data and phytoplankton taxa in the mesohaline estuary (1994-2006; biweekly, April-October; monthly, November-March) to evaluate phytoplankton assemblage responses to changing environmental conditions. Ordination techniques including non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), indicator species analysis, and BIOENV software were used to investigate potential environmental predictors of phytoplankton assemblage patterns under chronic eutrophication (see Rothenberger et al., Limnol. Oceanogr. 54: 2107-2127).

NMDS analysis by taxon / year
Use of long-term data and multivariate ordination techniques to identify environmental factors governing estuarine phytoplankton species dynamics. From Rothenberger et al. (2009).

Heterocapsa rotundata image
Harmful taxa Heterocapsa rotundata (above) and Heterosigma akashiwo (below). Heterosigma akashiwo image

Phytoplankton assemblages were strongly related to temperature and total nitrogen : total phosphorus (TN:TP) ratios, with expected seasonal changes in species composition. Inter-annual changes in river discharge influenced whether phytoplankton assemblages were dominated by diatoms and phototrophic flagellates, or by mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates. From this analysis, increasing NH4 + concentrations also emerged as an important influence on the phytoplankton assemblages. Raphidophytes (including potentially toxic Heterosigma akashiwo), haptophytes, chlorophytes, and the bloom-forming dinoflagellate Heterocapsa rotundata increased in more recent years (2000- 2006), concomitant with increasing NH4 + concentrations (e.g., 105 cells of H. rotundata mL-1 at NH4 + > 14 μM). Abundance of the toxigenic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum was positively related to dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), whereas the highest abundance of the grouping Pfiesteria spp., ‘pfiesteria-like’ dinoflagellates, and Karlodinium veneficum occurred during summer and fall and was related to high TP concentrations, temperature, and salinity. The data suggested an increasingly important role of NH4 + in controlling phytoplankton assemblage structure, including increased abundance of some harmful species, in this eutrophic estuary. The field study was supported by other field research and by laboratory experiments (e.g., NH4 + supports more rapid growth of H. akashiwo than nitrate or urea).

The CAAE has also characterized blooms in the Neuse Estuary that have been dominated or co-dominated by Prorocentrum minimum (e.g. see Springer et al. 2005, Harmful Algae 4: 533-551). The developing bloom was first detected from a web-based alert provided by the Center’s real-time remote monitoring (RTRM) platforms, indicating elevated dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH levels in the upper estuary. These data were used to augment shipboard sampling in characterizing bloom initiation, development, movement, and dissipation over a 7-month period (October 2001-April 2002).

Chlorophyll a (chla) within bloom areas averaged 106 +13 μg L-1 (mean + 1 SE), with a maximum of 803 μg L-1, in comparison to 20 μg L-1 outside the bloom. There were significant positive relationships between dinoflagellate abundance and TN and TP. NH4 +, NO3 -+NO2 -, and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentrations did not decrease within the main bloom, suggesting that upstream inputs and other sources provided nutrientreplete conditions. In addition, PAM fluorometric measurements (at 0900-1300 hours) of maximal PSII quantum yield (Fv/Fm) were consistently 0.6-0.8 within the bloom until late March, providing little evidence of photophysiological stress as would have been expected under nutrient-limiting conditions. An analysis of N uptake kinetics during the period when P. minimum was dominant (October- December) suggested that NH4 + was the major N species that supported the bloom. Bloom displacement (January-February) coincided with higher diversity of heterotrophic dinoflagellate species as P. minimum abundance decreased.

time sequence of chlorophyll a contours
Chlorophyll a concentrations (depth < 2.0 m) during a 2001-2002 dinoflagellate bloom,indicating temporal and spatial changes in phytoplankton density (n = 44 samples from 22 sites). Arrow indicates the upper-most salinity influence; note that the first panel (15 Nov 01) is representative of chla levels from mid-October through November. From
Springer et al. (2005).

 

 

home

 
Contact the webmaster
Website and all content, unless otherwise specified, are the property of the Center for Applied Aquatic Ecology.